Jack, In all fairness, lynde has a right - just as anyone else does - to take sides or formulate opinions based off the "facts". My major bone of contention is the supposition that R'osity (and/or its decision to remove the poll) was in any way democratic or espouses any ideals of democracy. I was attempting to show lynde that 1) democracy has no foothold here and, 2) she is just as apt to misread what is said as anyone else. In the dialog, IMHO, lynde proved that the accusations made by her and others stick equally to both sides. Therefore, it effectively nullifies some of the tangential "discussions" that have taken place.