huh? If you believe that,then you of all people should beleive that when the same thing is done repeatedly, that action must be changed. Example:Kid takes your car without your permission- crashes it and says "im sorry" and nothing is done about it- then what happens? the kid takes another car crashes it says I'm sorry, rinse repeat. 5 major contests within approx a year, a year, and all 5 of them have had controversy around them. And those are the ones i remember. There may be more. The first one involved a tie and the members were not allowed to vote on the tie breaker. there was no information posted on what would be done to break the tie until AFTER the admins picked who they wanted,. Any contest usually has a predefined framework for dealing with these situations ( logo contest) The 2nd one allegedly involved vote fixing by a member. (AOY last year) The third involved an admin winning a contest where software was involved (AFAICR the admin refused the prize)- People who are holding the contest are not elegable to enter them The 4th Involved some one winning in the photography forum,. and they tried to substitute a lesser value prize. And now this one. Andf you are claiming a higher ethic?