Addendum to my last post:

BillyJ also writes in #31:

Your kind of "vote" scopes the vastness of the internet and
beyond, my opinion is one kept to a mainframe of only a
very few "members and staff" actually deliberating between
themselves and then approaching the people in charge who
would ultimately still have the final word, hopefully based
on the decision among the team depending on argument and
circumstance.

If those in charge would still have the final word, then
what would the point of a jury be? As it stands we have
a jury system like what you describe; we're all jurors
right now, deliberating until we're blue in the face, and
as can be seen it's effecting absolutely nothing.