"It is not humanly possible to be consistent with every thread or comment or image...it just can't be done by one person." It depends on how you operate. If you base your decisions off your beilef system(s), it will generally be consistent; usually only taking into consideration growth with experience. However, censoring one member's comment while there are 149 others that also should probably be looked into is what I see the problem being. If you consider "fuck" to be an objectionable word, then it should not be allowed anywhere regardless of context. If it is good enough for Comment 2, then it is good enough for Comment 1; since both are personal opinions. Of course, if Comment 1 was removed due to reasons other than the use of "fuck" (like the blatant TOS violation), then that should be the reason stated and not "used a certain Anglo-Saxon variation of 'fornication'"; which would imply that it was the word, and not the context or content that was the problem. PC, I am sorry, but your personal life is of no interest to me; as I am sure my personal life is of no interest to you. Perhaps Mosca's personal life contributed to his making the comment? Would that make it any different? Considering the enforcement of the TOS, etc, in the past, I would have to say that most times members are not given enough chance to plead their case before the punishment(s) is/(are) meted out. So, Mosca's personal life has no merit nor was it an excuse for his comment, nor should anyone elses be considered as such. What does matter, is what is done here, regardless of what "outside influences" are at work. Would you allow your personal life to interfere with the care/treatment you give as a nurse? I surely hope not. Take the same approach here. Here you are not a person, but a mod, a R'osity Representative; just as I am not a person, but a R'osity member.