Illusions: your sophisms like " I did not address it to you, so I can say whatever I want, while you did adress that to me, so you are insulting me"... sorry I don't buy that. You were not respectful in the first place, with what you said about that dollar. So what are you talking about now... I have not insulted anyone. Please quote precisely the insults that I would have said in your opinion. Please stop repeating that I have insulted someone. Either you can PROVE it, or STOP accusing me, or maybe even better, let's the moderator decide and either ban me for having said insults, or you for accusing me falsely. And... about the fact that one man's art is another man's porno, as you said... No, sorry, if someone thinks that Michelangelo's paintings are porno, this does NOT make Michelangelo a porno artist. Sorry. Michelangelo's art is a bit bigger than that person's narrow and prudish vision of it. And finally... like it or not, nudity flag IS censorship. Sorry. I like to call things for what they are. Cheryle: When people talk on a subject, it's not necessarily because it is regarding someone. Sometimes people talk about principles. There was a discussion going on, on this thread. I joined in and said what I think. If I see a man killing another man, should I just go on and walk because it does not regard me directly? If I see someone starving on the street, should I ignore that because my very own stomach is full? It would be very narrow thinking, to speak only about things that regard us directly, and ignore the rest.