"'t's actually not very creative to use someone else's face anyhow' LSM, that's a rather judgemental thing to type in such broad strokes. It can be tremendously creative to use someone else's face." _dodger I meant that tongue in cheek - I probably should have typed that (why isn't there a tongue in cheek emoticon??) "I got my face for free, except for the slight creases here and there, which were earned. The final artist has gone to the effort to simulate that specific face, which is a lot harder than making a 'generic' face. As far as I'm concerned, I'm not suffering an investment loss. " Actually if you are a celebrity your face is not free lol it takes alot of hard work and promotion of that face and the persona that makes it a viable celebrity. For a celebrity it isn't just a "face" it is a persona they have strived and sepnt money to promote. If the final result was put to use to have you in a sex act with an animal or a president or something truly despicable would that be ok too? Extremes I know, but if you were very anti-drugs and it showed you with a bong would you be ok with that? Womens rights activist and the image portrayed you raping someone? That is what parody and satire often becomes. As for the government, not going to argue with you there.

3-D Arena | Instagram | Facebook

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
-Galileo