CyberStretch - You should have read this post further before repeating what ScottA wrote. At that I think you should put more thought into camberts reasonless flames, and kbennett's blind eyes through that post and the next. I definatelt dissagree, kbennett should have benn much more consciensuos, by conducting himself opposite to what hes done. As ScottA has explained, in the face of camberts flames, kbennett ignorantly locked the first thread, and for equally ignorant reasons refuses to lock the follow up thread that has veared off on an equally dissfunctional heading! Thus, I'm very dissapointed by kbennetts vigilence to my membership. Even now you can go to my second post and see members running on about nothing at all! It'll be a cold day in H-E-Double Hockey Stick before I let anything with creative signature be continued without my blessing, per the charge of one kbennett, mind you! = )