Boulder, now you play the role of the quiet defender of the justice, but your first thread on this subject was so inflammatory that the moderators have been forced to delete it. This truth has to be underlined, because now that your message has been deleted, it would be too easy -and too comfortable for you- to pretend that it did not exist. It existed, and his content was reputed as HIGHLY OFFENSIVE. And you are still responsible of that, even if that message you wrote is not there to be seen anymore. It was there, it was an attack, it was offensive, it was made public by you, and it has been read by people. And speaking about rules, there are rules not only for nudity. There are also rules for offenses and harassment to other members of Renderosity, and with your first post, you did break both. And to my knowledge, there were no 3 links in your first post, but just ONE link, the link to my product, and the post was a direct attack against my product. So it is plain FALSE what you write, that "there was no attack against the quality of the MP items or any personal attack etc...". There was indeed a CLEAR OFFENSIVE ATTACK against me and my product, and it was RECOGNIZED AS SUCH, not by me, who could be partial, but BY THE MODERATION. And it was judged so MUCH offensive that the MODERATION evaluated necessary to DELETE your post. This is the TRUTH and this truth has to be recalled here, in order for the readers not to be fooled into thinking that Boulder came into this subject riding the white horse of justice. He came as the most straight and offensive of forum flamers. Cheryle: As far as the "fair and respecful manner" goes... if the fair and respectful manner of doing this is publicly flaming someone (me and my product) on a forum, as Boulder did, I don't think that the moderators agree at all on your point.