Forum: Community Center


Subject: "Concern about MP item"

boulder opened this issue on Jan 21, 2003 ยท 44 posts


Cheryle posted Wed, 22 January 2003 at 7:52 PM

I don't actually care about your issue with boulder- that is between you and him. If your image did indeed include a nude of someone under 18 (what's considered "legal age" in the United states- where this site is hosted), then you have to abide by this site's stated rule of No nude children images. None. It's not you who would have the explaining to do, nor would you have to come up with legal fees- even if the image was found to be "innocent" enough by the Supreme court or a lower court- rosity still has to pick up the legal fees defending themselves- not to mention loss of servers (confenscated as evidence) while it gets sorted out.