Spike said: "Please remember that we don't host the free stuff, If we did, it would have to go through a approval process." Perhaps not, but I don't see much of an argument in a court of law since the Napster case, where they didn't host the material either. They just posted the information of whose PC they could download it from. Seems like you are in the same "boat" here, Spike. Signed: Non-legal expert...who THINKS things look similar.