Photopium opened this issue on Feb 18, 2003 ยท 39 posts
Photopium posted Tue, 18 February 2003 at 4:18 PM
Machine, I think they should come in and explain what is meant and how they intend to prove results from the "We're going to look at this more closely" comment. How can anyone protect themselves from accusations in the future by DAZ3d when they say a character contains their morphs??? What methods are they using to figure out that there's 5% of "Nose Ridge Thin" and 25% of "Eye Corner Down"? This IS NEW INFORMATION that they are going to "Look more closely". Anton even says they are going to go back and look at V1/V2/Mike stuff. Now watch this: In another thread last week I think, Anton says that they have a NEW PROCESS by which to identify their morph targets that was implemented in V3. NEW PROCESS. How are they going to go back to v1/V2 stuff if it's a new process to detect them? What, in fact, is this scary-good new process? I asked, and Anton said my questions were annoying, rather than explain how they intend to prove illegal Morph target distribution. This is all very new information, as it happens. As for the means of which to legally distribute characters based on DAZ morphs, there is a way. Pose Files. I offered an equal way to do this, at Anton's request to "Be Constructive" but it too was ignored. If this was you being treated thusly, you'd be just as angry and suspicious as I am right now. I know Anton's an Ivory Tower Dwelling Superhero to most of you, but try to see this from my angle for just a second and take a good hard look at who was first to be truly antagonizing in this whole affair. -WTB