SamTherapy opened this issue on Feb 19, 2003 ยท 41 posts
Jaager posted Thu, 20 February 2003 at 1:09 AM
Dave: (using V2 as an example) it is more than redistribution of the pristine morph, Your combined morph in question would not have existed if there were no V2 morphs, so making such a combined morph and sharing THAT is giving use of those morphs to someone who does not own V2. The morph OR its USE as an ingredient, if what you have done could not exist without those DAZ morphs, you may not distribute the work as deltas or as an OBJ file. You may distribute how to use the morphs - as keys - ie. a pose file. DAZ should just simplify all this and say that their morphs may not be shared - combined or loose - period - V1 V2 M1 M2. Splitting these hairs seems to confuse some. V1 and M1 morphs do just fine as keys too. Greg, if Russell could get RTEncoder as a Mac version, you could encode using one of the actual protected morphs as a key. It looked like Anton was trying to keep it simple and you are doing stunt flying - legal but beyond the ken of most. In your place, knowing the process to be within the rules, I would just do it and not ask, at least not in public. It does not seem to be a method they wish to encourage.