EricofSD opened this issue on Feb 20, 2003 ยท 24 posts
lmckenzie posted Thu, 20 February 2003 at 7:20 AM
I really appreciate your effort on this There are bound to be disagreements so the best you can do is to try to minimize them. I don't think it was the explicitness of the previous definition that was problematic (on the contrary), merely that it seemed too restrictive/conservative/whatever to some. The only potential problem I see with this revision is the contextual issue. Mermaid/lap dancer define the extremes pretty well. It seems that the same figures, same outfit, same pose, same decollete is OK in a blank scene or a living room but add some funky lighting and a jukebox and it's not OK. Loving family vignette of wife sitting on hubby's lap in one case, sleazy lap dancer chatting up a john in the other. I don't know if that's the case, fine either way. As long as the topic isn't cheesy satire for the artistically challenged I doubt dare enter, but just a thought. As to simple coverage, it would be easy enough to publish an diagram with the off-limits polygons highlighted in red. On the setting though... OK, I'm probably seeing problems where there are none, so I'll let the real artists hash this out. Thanks again for your willingness to work on this.
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken