I think some people here are failing to understand what art is. It is so much more than what you see in the end product. My son arranges leaves and stones in an awkward pattern, no, technical it is not. He scribbles with crayons, things he sees in his imagination. You mean to tell me this is not "art"? So, what is the difference here? If you can see that SOME thought went into the creation of something, and put aside the technical aspect, you will see that "like it or not, it is art". I don't care for Ruebens or Picasso, but I surely am not arrogant enough to say that it is "not art". Art is not what you see, but the process that has brought these images before you. Before you stick your nose in the air, realize that someone somewhere will think that you too are talentless. Mark