although his delivery was inappropriate,I have to say(Again) that what I don't understand is that when anyone ever leaves a less than shining critique,there is always the.. "I think it is interesting whenever someone trashes art so much, that if you go check their gallery there is nothing there...." argument. What does that have to do with it? I've said it before: I don't know how to play a piano so does that mean I can not decide what piano music I like and what piano music I don't like? I've been a member here for years(From the PFO days) and you don't see any images in my gallery here.I post them elsewhere. So does that mean I am not eligible to critique the art here? If said person was to leave a gleaming critique,would you still check to see if they had a gallery? Are only good critique's allowed by folks without galleries? That's like saying"Since you don't have a gallery,you can know what you DO like,but not what you DON'T like. Silly argument IMHO. The thread was obviously flame bait,but the fact they had no gallery should have nothing to do with it. Tom

“The fact that no one understands you…Doesn’t make you an artist.”