Well, Having pt my foot in my mouth in regard to Bryce's future before, I guess it's time I do so again... How is the UI Bryce? So it's unique and what we are all comfortable with at this point in our collective Bryce careers, but how does a UI make the program? I mean, I can understand how it can break one, but come on. If the UI were different, but still managable, would not the end result "be Bryce." Maybe I'm naive, but I always thought that it was the fantastic images that rival $1500-$5000 programs that "made Bryce." I thought it was the level of complexity available in the material and terrain editors that "made Bryce." Am I wrong and all this time I was using Bryce, I could have gotten all the same results with another program and UI? Simplifying, expanding and or flat out changing that interface may be a hard pill to swallow, but I consider the Art made possible by Bryce to be what "makes Bryce."