I think I agree mostly with Don, if the images are going to be viewed on a CRT, (or even printed in a magazine). I doubt I could tell the difference. I'm not real sure I agree if the result is going to be a paper print, (or a slide for projection). I think here silver still rules; though I have seen some really nice prints from newer inkjets. There is still an area I'm researching, and am still having trouble finding the facts. That is, in the available dynamic range. Films cover a range of about three stops above, and three below, average. Within this range details can be recorded. Films, particularly B&W films, may be wider than this. Films also have an "S-curve" characteristic, which will even show something beyond this middle range. Digital cameras have a very sharp cutoff rather than a graceful S, and there is also blooming at the bright end and noise at the dark end. I suspect this relates to the depth and vibrancy characteristics you mention, but I haven't nailed down the facts. dpReview is now publishing dynamic range for various cameras, so I hope to get around to including this in the series on Zone System for Digital. In practical matters, both digital and analog cameras are tools which complement each other. Neither is inherently "better" than the other, (which is not really what you were asking in the first place).