Geez, Punk, for the last time... 'they' are the ones who did post the attitude above. It's out there, we've heard it here in the Poser forum time and again and I don't believe there was any mistaking the person I quoted or the reactions of the 20 posts in this thread above mine. I didn't take his "2 (more seriously)" any more seriously due to the statement: "Hypothetically speaking of course, since I'm glad mind numbing art has a very own gallery." Not everyone had the same attitude and I never said they did. I am not condeming your entire forum, not in the least. But the attitude of several there (and elsewhere on this site condeming poser to a new member) tended to lump Poser users into the category I mentioned without a thought to the consideration that some of us use Poser in conjunction with 2D and Modeling apps. I don't know how to make in any more clear other than anytime someone throws a blanket statement about Poser being click and render only, I'll remind them that it's often more than they realize. Now if you want to discuss the issues, the validity of poser art, or whether postwork constitutes 2D vs 3D... fine, but your tone indicates a wish to simply argue and I'm in no mood for an arguement that has nothing to do with the issues.

...... Kendra