OK, how about clothing textures Never mind that the texture names seldom refer to the figure in their name, how about the readme not even making explicit the clothing item it is for. Often, the only direction is in the text under the thumbnail - sometimes on the thumbnail. After years of doing this, I think the way to go is to group clothing textures by clothing item, not author of the texture. Nesting in P5 makes this even more appealing. It does play chaos with MATposes, but few of them do more than merely assign a texture. When and if thre are MATposes that do wonderful things with the nodes and options in P5, then those MATposes would be worth salvaging. But, how many MATposes even make explicit what they are for? The names of textures should include a geometry reference. Clothing items should have a three or four letter unique abbreviation for the texture linkages.