This is a quote from the EULA: "...or sublicense any: (1) rendered output or texture map of Anna-Marie Goddard combined with the body shape of Anna-Marie Goddard, or her name or initials for commercial purposes..." I think the intention here is to make sure you don't use the morphs combined with the textures and the name for any commercial purpose. I think this means you could use the textures without the morphs or the morphs without the textures and not use her name at all and be ok with it for commercial use. The only part that concerns me is in their last point (#3) they neglect to use this language and do not tie the mophs and textures and names together. Point number 3 is where there is still trouble lurking. If they correct the EULA and fix the language in point 3 I think it would be ok to use the product as long as you're not trying to sell it AS Anna-Marie Goddard. You could probably even use the morphs and textures together and call it "Jungle Queen Sheila" for example and be fine as long as you don't use her actual name. Of course, I'm not a lawyer and I don't work for DAZ so clarification is necessary but this is the impression I got from reading the altered EULA (and I think it is a position that is arguable in court if they fix #3). Just my .02 Frank