"We must all remember that this issue is not really about nudity per se. It's about the context of nudity in the image. " Sorry but for at least 2 of us, the nudity and or context of nudity has nothing to do with our concerns at all. My concerns are simply with the process of image removal/notification and appeal venues. I also have some concern as to the public reactions of the mods in the first thread, note, I do not claim to judge on behind the scenes behaviour, just simply on what they publically posted in black and white in the first thread. Some mods reacted admirably, some regrettably did not. However that is a minor concern, to the main one, which has still gone unanswered, which is the standard the picture was held to. If it was held to the TOS and the TOS only, fine and good. Job well done to the mods. If however the picture was held to the standard of "family-oriented site", how can anyone get upset, is beyond me, when an artist reacts badly to the decision of picture removal, since the artist could NOT possibly have known this standard existed. Asking the artists to agree to a TOS, and abide by it's rules, and then judging by another unwritten set is ludicrous.