elektra opened this issue on Jun 30, 2003 ยท 14 posts
maclean posted Mon, 30 June 2003 at 5:50 PM
WAAAYYY better than the first version. That's more or less the camera angle I was talking about 1st time round. And I wouldn't go with the longer lens thing. You'd lose the whole wide-angle effect which gives the figures depth. I see you moved her fist up too. Much better. At this point, I'd only say 2 things. One is (again) the sky. I think it should be really dark and thundery and dramatic. But that's a matter of taste. My other feeling is that the buildings look a touch 'cardboardy', which in a way makes the figures stand out more, but I'm not sure about it. Is there a bump map for them? Or maybe you could go with emily's suggestion and separate the buildings in a render, then postwork them. My feeling is that they look realer than the buildings. That's what I was trying to say. Lookin' good. mac