It seemed like a matter of respect to me - and still does looking back on the text... and I'm one of those who advocates "if you don't want to be offended by flesh don't look at nudity" and "parents have to take SOME responsibility for their children - this includes filtering suspect images where there's an option to do so". There's still IMHO no need to refer to other people's children en masse, without any information on said children except that their parents would rather keep the mental pollution to a minimum, as "brats" - there's no basis to suggest that the term is applicable. To suggest otherwise seem disingenuous. Oh yes - and I think I disagree with lumping "Adult" (above and beyond nudity) in with "Violence". There seems to be little correclation between the two to me, beyond restricting access by minors - in which case chnging "nudity" to a simple age setting (or a number of age settings if need be) in keeping with movie ratings might be the way to go. Cartoon "Tom and Jerry" type violence might still be problematical in "scoring" however.