The non-transferable license is something that on first glance seems unreasonable, but when looked into makes sense (as this thread has shown). I think the only circumstance under which it should be allowed is if the original purchaser has given up Poser altogether. (Which actually seems to be the case above.) On the other hand there IS something in the license agreement here (and I've seen it elsewhere too) that I completely ignore because it's unreasonable. "Buyer may make a single backup copy of this archive file, for personal archival purposes only" "personal archival purposes only" is certainly fine, but 'single backup copy' is absurd.