Chuck, Yes, I do (kind of) agree. I'd hate to see nothing but sentimental doggy and kitty images too. What I'm saying is that picking an offensive subject or symbol for it's shock value does not, to me, constitute art. It's possible to create shocking art without offending people. Damien Hirst, being a good example of original, inventive art which makes you look at things in a new way, but doesn't rely on tackiness or bad taste for it's impact. I would never, ever agree with any kind of censorship for artists. But I've seen a lot of stuff that is in questionable taste, and the artists attitude is "How dare you criticize me. I'm an artist and I can do what I like" Ah well, it's a big and complex subject and everyone sees it their own way. I just don't think an artist should be excused his/her vulgarity under the guise of art. pax mac PS CharlieT - Georgous removed the pic himself. Not because of any complaints. See posts above.