Here is a Rough translation of what he is saying: "For me, art of ability comes. But not alone of purely skilled-labor ability alone. Let become the art an idea reality. To express the art emotions in a picture, which style means one makes use of in addition also. One can love pictures, can ignore, hate, but they are yet always a copy of an emotional condition of the creating. Constructed 3D scenes have not that at itself, they are emotion loose cold and almost offensively perfect. Here an artist does not sit before the computer, but rather a Meshkonstrukteur that mathematically exact objects generates. More engineer as an artist, equal like one it sees. That is not the way as well as Bryce works. Bryce is an Intuitionsmodeller, a 3d creativity amplifier, that for experimenting and trying einl. He who is knowledgeable therewith, that creates emerge are more expressive it in minutes pictures worlds to let, that just not sterile perfectly, but just therefore often substantially. So how computer painting differs as a rule of conventional painting. Even long-time pros with Bryce discover again and again new methods in order to realize therewith things, that seem even with Highendmodellern hardly doable. To realize see just the method HDRI in Bryce, to simulate Radiosity so perfectly that one sees the difference to a Programmfeature of expensive programs no longer. Even global illumination becomes on a little and not very complicated detour doable. That settles Bryce also with: Bryce as 3D laboratory for always new tricks and would pinch. " I agree.