No offence, but I tend to paraphrase Barbara Cartland's immortal words whenever I see a critic that want to tell other people what to do with their work. She said, something like, "People that can't write a coherent postcard tell me how to write a novel...". How can you give effective critiques when you do not know the characteristics of the material, the limits and possibilities of a certain technique, the limits or possibilities of each color and how they fit with each other to achieve certain effects, the limit and possibilities of the apertures and focal lengths of the simulated cameras employed in this program? As I said, I mean no offence, but your critiques would for these reasons be near useless -- and all they would do is pamper to some sort of ideal of how art should be rather than how are is.