I read some of his posts and I agree with Momcat : 1- When he criticizes art, his critiques are not uninteresting and do offer some propositions for improvement 2- A good thing he could do would be to offer positive criticism : telling what was good is as important as pointing out the faults 3- When he criticizes other things than pure art, his opinions are more debatable 4- The initial attitude was a bit blunt and could use some softening. End of my critiques on his critiques. (PS : Momcat : fun site indeed ! Meow !)