I can understand the reasoning concerning misunderstandings of the text I used to 'sell' the render and I have been posting renders here long enough to have a feel for renders that skate the edge of the TOS.

I didn't mean to sound flippant with my remarks but I was really just making light of the situation. What I really wanted to know however was exactly what was deemed unsuitable about the render.

Was it the graphic portrayal of a detailed female genital? Was it the application of body piercings? Was the overall theme inapropriate?

I'm not making a big deal over this but as is stated in the post above the reason given me is so wide and unspecific a catch-all any render could be arbitrarily deleted.

I don't know who or how many complained about the render but if anyone was to recieve a form email it could just as easily have been them. The image did not violate the TOS (except for that huge catch-all) and I took suitable precautions to prevent it from being viewed unvoluntarily. Anyone who viewed that render knew what they were in for and so why complain?

To be fair, I think the staff has a difficult job in assessing the suitability of renders and handles the task with a degree of seriousness and concern - if it was just a judgement call, I can live with it. I would however like to know specifically what was considered unsuitable :)