ok no one is saying Porn.. no one. not even explicate sexual contact. also you are right a child can not make an informed consent..or choice THAT IS WHY THERE ARE PARENTS AND/OR GUARDIANS. I know there are netbabysitters you can get for comps. also the parents need to be making the choices for underagers. I am sorry but no way would my kids be cruising the net with out some sort of supervision. period. why? because I find some things not for their viewing at their age. -I- make the choice and police what my children view. the net is not a playground for children with out some sort of guidance. with that said..I go back to the point of this being a site with mixed viewers. if you think a nude in the gallery is going to get you into legal trouble ...go to the market place and you will REALLy be in trouble. You can not have one standard for one side and not the other. am I saying get rid of the nudity in the market place ..no. definatly not. what I am saying is if it is good enough for the market place why isnt it good enough for the galleries? Nudity is not wrong. it shouldnt be dirty. like I said in the other thread..those that think it is..god what are you going to do on judgement day when you face your maker? what tell him.."ohh yes btw that form you did the human? it was horrible just smut..totally dirty! how could you put those parts on there?" sorry but nude is not dirty. it is not porn. My god even the churches have nude cherubs and angels. well some of the older ones.

https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/

Commission Closed till 2025