Guess AsherD wrote that the matter is not protecting the children but improving art. So eg a classical nude is art, but a 'porny' nude isn't. If you want to understand the difference, go to the museum.

Ok, lets go. At first to Spain, Museo de Prado. There this picture of Correggio is hanging:

Animal sex? Leda is nude and also classical, but the swan (animal!) is touching her. Obviously she is attracted by him and anyone knows that this is the begin of an explicit sexual but nevertheless 'classical' story. Does this conflict with the Rosity TOS and the law of Tennessee?
I don't know. Test yourself, dear Rosity admins!

Now lets walk to the National Gallery of London. There hangs a picture of a guy called Michelangelo who obviously doesn't respect the TOS of Renderosity:


This horny swan, deep between her legs - oh, I better do not think about what she does with her legs! - touches with his arrow ...cough..., with his neck her breast, with his beak her mouth and their pose in all ... so tender, so lustful - no, I must look away ashamed!
If this classical nude is ok according to the TOS then I do not worry about the pictures I'm intending to post.