quoted thread in that "debate" comes from renderosity as well... this one: http://www.renderosity.com/messages.ez?Form.ShowMessage=1401633 it strikes me that the reputation of epilogue for being anti-poser is mostly fired by people who never even went to epilogue or submitted art there... and are just sympathising with a friend who got rejected for technical reasons, not solely due to use of poser. there are genuine cases of trolls who have come in this forum (renderosity's poser forum) who posted anti-poser drivel but the anger somehow got redirected to epilogue... perhaps this misdirected anger is because epilogue is the only art site most of us know which explicitly states that 3d art is judged thusly: "Poser, Bryce and other software Artwork created in these programs must be of exceptional quality to be approved. " and people assume the worst... instead of seeing it as intended: that epilogue will expect you to do more to make sure your image is not just stock output from software - eg poser can produce you a fairly good head profile in a few seconds which you can paint over whereas someone using a pencil would take a few more minutes... so epilogue's policy is just to even up the playing field. IMO.

[ Store | Freebies | Profile ]

a sweet disorder in the dress kindles in clothes a wantoness,
do more bewitch me than when art is too precise in every part