I'm all for saving Bryce, but if adding a bunch of new features/Iface is the plan, why not slap a new name on it? I like to see how artist can create something (like Rochr and sbleci) using software which was designed for making landscapes. Sounds to me like you're trying to create software that resembles Bryce, not Bryce itself. Putting a huge price tag on it doesnt sound too appealing either. Just a couple of my thoughts.