Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/index.ez?viewLink=193

MY GOD Joey? Do you HAVE any clue to the irony of your position? First of all... YOU ARE NO ONE to close any matter. You're not a mod. You're not the owner of the site. You have absolutly NO MORE say in the matter than me or any one else. "Hey, was anyone talking about SEXUAL CONDUCT? Gosh, no -- we were talkijng about whether or not the young lady in the original thread was NAKED. Which she WAS. Wow. What an insight." Ok, class... quick poll, what catagory would you put "Nudity" under. If, as you claim, the Nudity tag has no bearing on the TOS rules of sexual conduct, then there are NO RULES about it. ANYWHERE! So shut up. Cause no one is breaking any rules. No that we HAVE established there is no RULE. Let work on the higher level or respecting each other. You still haven't addressed the INTENT of the nudity flag. If it's just clothes, then hat's and bow ties will mean the character is NO LONGER NUDE. We can post as much indecency as the TOS will allow without hitting the nudity flag, by your narrow definition, and screw any one who doesn't like it because "She's clearly wearing socks." Quite frankly, I think our definition that goes by standards set by TV and other popular media is far more compliant with the INTENT of the nudity flag. If she's showing certain area's, hit the nudity flag. My only problem with that is sometimes I forget. Sorry. I'm only human. By your narrow definition every post that shows a fist, or a Naked Vicky in a Temple with a Sword must have the violence tag set because there is a hint of violence. Now watch this trick... If it's [oppressive] like a [Nazi], I'm gonna call it a [Nazi]. Sorry if that upsets anyone (including the [Nazi's]). But after reading this thread on the heels of the similarly absurd one over "[How dare you question the] one image a day [rule]?????" whine-fest, I'm tired of obtuseness being passed off as victimhood. "[My delicate sensibilities are offended when I see nudity]!" -- oh, please, spare me. [Ignore] the damn button, then get a life and move on, huh? Until the mods decide to change that particular rule, it's in effect FOR EVERYONE, even the politically oppressed. Gee, do you understand my side better now that I've plugged my desires into your exact same tyraid. Of course not. It's still inflamatory BS. I can never convice the mods to change any rule unless I can discuss it. I can't discuss anything if you're going to go on a personal attack every time you don't like my opinion. You're a hypocrit. ">> You are actually not allowed to treat people disrespectfully in this forum If it's stupid like a duck, I'm gonna call it a duck." You tell all of us to follow a nudity rule that doesn't exist, yet openly refuse to follow the published rules of this forum, repeatedly. Then openly make a statemtn that your going to continue to NOT FOLLOW THE RULES!!!! If the rules are so important to you, follow them all. If you get to pick and choose which rules you follow, why shouldn't we? Are you some how special that the rules DON'T apply to you? If you read the TOS, you'll see that those rules about not abusing fellow members are higher up than ALL the sexually releated rules. That ussually means they are MORE important. And lastly.... You still have yet to show a single fact that supports your decision. While I've presented resonable alternatives, in civil manner, with several referances to who, what where, how, and why my opinion is what it is, your logic to this point has been NOTHING but "Do it cause I say so." And you are in NO position tell any of us anything. Let's put it to a poll of everyone here. No matter who's opinon you agree with. Which one of us has been more reasonable and respectful?