ChuckEvans opened this issue on Dec 01, 2003 ยท 71 posts
Finister posted Mon, 01 December 2003 at 3:31 AM
Well, I must say that I do appreciate it very much when the cutesy warning is placed at the header of threads that concern topics that literally scare the heck out of me. But seriously, (on the topic of nudity and the TOS), I think ones own personal views of the world will affect how each of us perceive a naked woman or man or a fully clothed person for that matter. In Disney's "beauty and the Beast" (rated G)isn't Beauty under a form of bondage in beast's castle? One could almost use that movie as a case study in how abducted women fall in love with their captor. Everyone sees the world through their own point of view. And if the nudity warning is going to be enforced equally than perhaps when someone uses nudity as a heading and the thread does NOT acually contain any nudity will mods act upon complaints? That would be silly. But I do think that before folks are ready to 'lay down the law' they better not complain when the rules come back to bite them. I also notice this phrase being said a lot lately "I'm not a prude, but...". It's being used so often that it's kind of funny - like Larry Flynt saying "I'm not a pervert, but...." fin out the side door before the rotten refuse flies :P