Sorry for not really reading all that ranting about the 300D indoors. There'll always be people having to rant as there'll always be people (just as an example) loving the Sony F828 for being the best one can ever buy (without ever having that cam in their hands or at least reading a review of someone, having it). I especially love the talk of people declaring any lens below 1000 as "shards" .. i almost think, they love to hear themselfes talk? They shouldn't talk that much and take pictures instead ...

That's the reason, why i'm starting to ignore every review in the web .. lot's of blahblah one can believe .. or not. No way to know, whom one can trust. I'd prefer to ask Donald over here .. sure i can trust him! :)

What's true: the 300D does underexpose if she doesn't get the perfect exposure. That's quite fine with me for i am able to repair an underexposed pic really easily via computer whilst an overexposed pic ist lost .. nothing to repair. Also, that does apply only in 0.1% of my pics .. at a maximum. 90% are done in manual mode where i myself am the one who has done something wrong if the exposure isn't perfect, 9.9% the camera getting it quite perfect and 0.1% that may be underexposed for someone. Not to me, but one can discuss that. So it's just you who has to decide. As the 10D uses almost the same electronics, that problem (if it would exist) would be hers too.

Sorry for not being able to agree this time dear Brenda. *hugz, Tom :)