Great attempt by both of you (Sharen and redon634) but this is why I stay away from such comparisions. It is a combination of "subjective" opinions I think and very difficult to make "objectively scientific". I remember the same sort of thing happened when Vue 3 came out and people wanted Vue 3 to Bryce 4 "Side By Side". Naturally nearly all Brycers picked the Bryce version as best and Vuers the Vue version. Each comparision depends on software skill level with each product and often "subconciously prejudicial" choices can be made, even if not conciously intentional. Who's "better" the Marlins or the Yankees? -is their really a scientifically "unbiased" answer to that? There will be lots more "Daz Studio vs Poser" comparisions like this coming, I'm certain it will be more of a fun sport, than anything. But I'm not knocking people's efforts here, as while it may not determine a real "best-winner", it does give people an idea that DS offers a NEW choice that will be different from Poser. And if you like that look better, then that's what you will use DS. If not, you will use Poser. (Both use different renderering technologies too, which also makes a real Apples to Apples comparison difficult).