Gee, this thread seems to miss the issue... I don't wan't to filter nudity... I want to be able to see body morphs etc offered in Freestuff and I don't care if people in my home see nudes... it is a little more difficult for me to feel good exposing my children to images of women in bondage, fetishware, porno gags or with strange anatomy in poses sugestive of violence... if the figure had her big virtual boob flopped over her arm in a reclining pose or was even just poking it with her virtual index finger... or was a heavy set figure herself in the belly... whatever... but this is clearly a porno pose... those are porno tits on a porno babe in a porno pose... even skinny women with big breasts don't look like that (I have taught painting for over a decade and seen maybe a hundred nude models including all sorts) and I don't belive women commonly walk around the house squeezing the hell out of their breasts... this is an image based on a fantasy obviously not based on versimalatude... to suggest the image doest reflect porno conventions in everyway is diengenuous... BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR POST. And I don't actually find this thumbnail as offensive as the torture and bondage props posed with figures, why loving sex is restricted but images of sexual violence (even of the so-called role-playing variaty") are endorsed is not clear to me.