Attached Link: http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=579589&Start=73&Sectionid=1&filter_genre_id=0&WhatsN

ok I thought I posted this here but it was in the other thread but this will show the flat out double standard and hypocracy. ------------------------------------------------------ http://www.renderosity.com/viewed.ez?galleryid=579589&Start=73&Sectionid=1&filter_genre_id=0&WhatsN OK prime example..... the pic in question was pulled due to the "maybe touching " thing and the "implied sexual situation" right? ok go look in the gallery right now. there is a wonderful picture there very very very well done. with -two woman touching each others butts clearing- very sexually charged situation. but.... it is left in. ---------------------------------------------------- I asked a admin about it....guess what I was told... that the pic is not sexually charged and that it is ok not a violation of TOS...hmmm but they are touching...the butts no less....and that lil mona lisa smile...with shear underwear on.....hmmmmmm I wonder why the smile... now to the admins.... OH FOR PETES SAKES COME ON! Yes a beautiful picture but it IS against your very own TOS. but apparently not enough to get pulled..but the other pic was....God ..no not a bit of hypocracy here.

https://www.darkelegance.co.uk/

Commission open.