unstrung65 opened this issue on Jan 25, 2004 ยท 44 posts
cereus posted Sun, 25 January 2004 at 6:39 PM
Pardon me too. I agree with unstrung65. DHolman claims "This isn't a photography website". It could be. If we want it to. I don't think that we should feel like second degree image creators just because we do photography. The value of a photograph is just as valuable as any image, whether it is done in oil, a 3D-program or whatever. It's a handy-craft. Some photographers work in a darkroom with traditional methods, others work digitally. What counts is the RESULT. The IMAGE! I often see images with many comments. But the comments are often VERY positive, but the image could be improved in many ways. I have a few times tried to be constructive in my criticism, but I don't know how this has been taken by the photographer in question. I think it is ideal to grive criticism in connection to the photo, i e in the gallery. /Jan