no, I'm indifferent to the presence or absence of both adult content or religous content, Hell i've even posted one or two "angel" renders of my own, and guess what, out of my entire gallery I have 1 picture with exposed breasts (guess that shoots down your idea about porn-pervs and god-haters) What I'm saying is that if you're going to have a tos, it needs to be applied evenly or it's entirely pointless. Personally i thought it was a decent enough image and was not offended by it. But that is irrespective of the point, the point is the TOS says it's a no-no, so either the TOS needs to be re-worked (i don't care what it allows or doesn't) or it needs to be tossed. You can't make exceptions. You can believe all you want that this is a god-hating pornographers' conspiracy to keep the christian down, but seriously, all some of us want is a fair and even application of the TOS.