timefighter opened this issue on Feb 17, 2004 ยท 182 posts
XENOPHONZ posted Wed, 18 February 2004 at 11:36 PM
If I'd post, say, an erotic gay image that was blatantly in violation of the TOS
I think that the key word in your statement is "erotic".
If someone were to post an erotic heterosexual image, the staff would likewise take it down.
"Eroticism" and "Religion" are two very different issues --
However, a simple TOS change (hint, hint)...
Not that changing the TOS will change anyone's mind. Far from it.
An altered TOS will merely allow "artistic freedom" to exist on a central life issue - religious faith.