Oh, I see what you mean. Geneb19, it's not whether or not the image would "arouse" the viewer. It's whether or not the image shows a human figure in an obvious state of arousal. Simply put, it's not whether the image gives you a woody, it's whether the image depicts a woody. So, photo of Michaelangelo's David would be ok ... penis but no woody ... .

Could be worse, could be raining.