And I could show you some TERRIBLE acrylic paintings and some wonderful Poser pictures, and say, there, you see - Poser is better. That's no sort of an argument. Incidentally, the same sort of argument used to rage as to whether a painter used photos to work from. This was supposed to degrade the quality of the painting. Well, either you can see it the painting or you can't, and one shouldn't start to dismiss, say, Emily Carr just because historians finally discovered she DID use photos. It's all snobbery. As to Poser being unsuited to animation, that may be true, I have no interest in animation.