debitspread opened this issue on Mar 13, 2004 ยท 21 posts
Jackson posted Sun, 14 March 2004 at 9:04 PM
"Yes. This did happen, with notes at PoserPros and here. " Guess I did miss something then. You have any links to where I can read up on it? "Actually, I know that development was being done on D|S before the EULA debacle. Not guessing, and not opinion. I know becuase I was asked about my opinion regarding a potential product capable of such things, specifically from DAZ, via IM, on another site, in excess of one year ago. And probably just lost a friend in saying so, tyvm. IIRC, the EULA hoop-de-rah went on at P5's release, which was well over a year ago. I'm sorry about your friend, you don't have to reveal any secrets here; you can IM me ;) "Why would the biggest Poser content creator not go forward otherwise? Therein is the issue. Why? Because they believe that their future growth is limited if they focus on producing content for a single application." Okay, I'll just give in that you know what's going on at DAZ, what they're thinking, and why they do what they do. Please explain to me then why they're still creating content for P4/PP? And how could making, say, some dynamic hair, hurt them any more than transmapped hair? How about brokering? Why not broker dynamic clothing items? You get my drift. Creating or selling content for P5 wouldn't hurt DS any more than creating or selling content for P4 (IMO). I still believe DAZ isn't going with P5 products because of the P5 EULA. That's what I remember them saying and--so far--I have no reason to think otherwise. Okay, I'm done. You can go ahead and get that last word in now ;)