Forum: Poser - OFFICIAL


Subject: The Art and Theory of Digital Cloning

Zarabanda opened this issue on Mar 26, 2004 ยท 70 posts


Riddokun posted Sun, 28 March 2004 at 7:30 AM

btw i think that people should eb indulgent about "theories" and educationnal speech about digital cloning, at least becasue the movie and video game industry is all but too happy to find such talents/skills already in their employees woul they hire one more to do that. Do you think people who made Alias or Buffy video games asked a guy to take a few monthes to learn HOW to digitally clone garner or gellard ? no they surely hired someone that had such talent/skills already in hand and were all but too happy that he was ready/able to do it :) and by the way yes papparazzi invade privacy, but digital cloners would not. I mean those stars always show themselves in public, so their image is "public" (not in a copyright view strictly speaking, because the "photograph of the pictures has a right on his work, and stars havea right on theri own image) but hey, they seems to "give up" a bit of their self image right because they always show gthemselves. I, as an anonymous citizen am entitled the SAME rights to privacy and selfimage right (of course it is not as much violated because i do not make crowd bathes) but if i am shot in a public place (street, etrc) by a magazine, i cannot sue the newspaper or the magazine BECAUSE i am in a public place. (of course under certain circomstances i can forbidd the use of a shot featurign me, even in the background, if my image is shown or displayed or used in a demeaning way or a way that can hurt me socially or in other way, but it is rare) so in fact, stars have same rights as citizens, but they willingly/tacitely "abandon" a small portion of their rights on this matter because they uses their image professionnally and publicly ! and quit beating the dead horse, or else, just mail beyonce agent and tell him to sue rosity, zarabanda and us. if people were always to sue everyone for everything, even in fair/educationnal purpose/use, judges and courts would be overcrowed by stars, paparazzi and poor guies, while drugdealer, killers and such would ahve a free time roaming dowtown ! come on ! in fact we are in a society and time when ANYONE can SUE EVERYONE/ANYONE for nearly virtually ANY kind of grief, legally. The grief list and possibilities is saturated. Would we always use it systematically, it would be a law hell ! still i am embarassed at Arduino's Wolfgang, and could legitimately be annoyed, but i won't sue him ! because even if it would be legal or possible, it is just insane and nonsense. Next day i sue my neighbor, next my parents... have something else to do of my week than suing the world ! lawsuit paranoia and copyright madness is just the new poison of our days !