A_ : "well, I honestly don't know anymore! :) I see nothing offensive in your image, but I don't see anything offensive in product pages of textures for the MilGirls when they are all young and naked - I see it as a product page" One problem with people is that they are weird. Hugely, terribly, wonderfully, strangely, convolutedly and bizzarrely weird. At best. There are models of allsorts of clothing in the various stores - let's eschew Dot (poor goil!) and stockings, suspenders and the like and move on to the less obvious shoes. Imagine if you will a catalog of all the Shoes available for Poser (yes, even horseshoes) rendered equisitely and showing nothing of the "human" models above the ankle. To you and I and, I expect, the majority of people that's a catalogue of shoes. To a foot fetishist it's an equivalent to PlayBoy (crude analogy). That doesn't mean that the modellers/texturers/catalogue producers made porn - the fetishist gets excited by something regardless of the artists intent. When people choose to self-censor has to be down to them. Personally, as a closer example, if I was selling models I wouldn't think twice or care if strange people clutched renders of the latest in "shoe fashions from the house of Who" to their bosoms and got all excited about them. With luck it'd increase sales. People are, on the whole, strange - you simply cannot judge everyone by your own standards :( Who...cares?