My 2 cents: 1. Daz3D as well as others should have included genitals in their figures. Male or female or children it doesn't matter. How can they claim that their figures are realistic when they are missing important body parts? Funny how nobody tried to sue them for false claims :-) 2. I have seen the offending image. There are always people that dislike that kind of images but they have "nudity" switch and I don't have "blood and gore" or "zombie" or "freak" or "fetish" switch to prevent me from seeing zombies, freaks and such sh*t. When I am at it there is also no "lousy art" switch and there should be one. If they insist on banning images they dislike then I am sure many people will start insisting on censoring other "art" categories and this place soon won't be interesting to anyone. 3. Is there any money back policy here? Can you return the goods you have purchased if you are not satisfied with quality? How can you judge the texture quality and mesh detail without close-up renders? Will you base your buying decision solely on product title? If so why don't you base your watching decision on product title also? It is simple -- if it hurts your eyes then don't look at the Sun. 4. Quoting keihan: "First, "porn" can be defined as an image (or imagery) that incites sexual arousal." -- so if someone gets aroused by watching lace will you clasify it as porn? 5. The way I see it, only limited people deny existence of things they don't understand or approve and they even go as far as trying to destroy them. They will certainly use every opportunity to raise their "purist" and "awareness" rating by demanding genitals removed everywhere but they will silently ignore things like global warming and pollution or bad state politics. After seeing this thread it is obvious why Jesus was nailed to the tree for asking people to be more tolerant. Now excuse me, I have to crawl back under my stone...