I looked and have morphs on both sides... lots of them. Unfortunately many don't seem to do anything obvious. Setting a buff pec at 1 produces a blatant visual change, but not on the triceps. But the Don I'm using does indeed have morphs on both sides. Hmmm... now to figure out if he IS the one from the Content CD. It is hi-res, so it ought to be. Richard III was a superb warrior and very decent administrator, calumnied by the victors. :sigh: Since exposure was part of the coronation ceremony, if he had been a hunchback he would never have been shown almost nude to the public during investiture. (Somehow I just cannot picture Queen Elizabeth II standing on a balcony in her underwear for any reason... so they must have changed things a bit in the last few hundred years.) He tested a new sword blade by beheading a flock of sheep, and was used to fighting all day so the muscles on that side were overdeveloped. It is probable that many of his best fighters also had the same pattern... and that any twistiness was due to the lifestyle rather than a birth defect. There are male rowers out in Africa who paddle with one leg... after years they get really muscled on one side which affects their walk. There are very good portraits of the king, so dressing him shouldn't be that hard. I'm working on facial morphs, and might see what can be done there. Meanwhile, if you have lemons and ice... make lemonade. ;^) If his left shoulder looks like a computer hacker's and his right looks like Conan's, you might have trouble fitting him, but a little bit of difference ought to make for an interesting image. Carolly