You are absolutely correct in that thought, but I feel the proper thing that should have been done, are 2 things. First the author of the article, should have done a little more research in regards to a specific image she used in her article. She makes a statement regarding the name of the image and how it was created and in fact it was not accurate. Second the person they are referring to as the creator of the image, that person should have contacted the creators of models used to find out if he could first use it and if they would like credit. It should have been addressed to the original creators and let them give permission to use their names or not to use their names. To composite an image can be very time consuming and it is from our own work this is done, as we all know, but if it was not for the aid of models, textures, morphs that others have created, you might not have that composite. Oh by the way.....debating is a great thing. Let the debate continue cause this is how we learn. Thank you for your comments. Sharen